Fiat 180-90 (DT) or Massey Ferguson MF 3680?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 180-90 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 3680 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Massey Ferguson 3680 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 11% (5.5 L/min / 1.5 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fiat 180-90 (DT) and Massey Ferguson MF 3680, with the call on each
Question180-90 (DT)MF 3680Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?132.5 kW (177.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 180-90 DT”132.5 kW (177.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3680”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 180-90 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 3680 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 180-90 (DT) and the MF 3680.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 180-90 (DT) and the MF 3680.
Which pumps more oil for implements?50.8 L/min (13.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 180-90 DT”56.3 L/min (14.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3680”AheadThe Massey Ferguson 3680 has 11% more hydraulic flow (5.5 L/min / 1.5 gpm) than the Fiat 180-90 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?6,600 kg (14,551 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 180-90 DT”6,060 kg (13,360 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3680”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?6,330 kg (13,955 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 180-90 DT”5,799 kg (12,785 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3680”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?10,000 kg (22,046 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 180-90 DT”—No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the MF 3680.
Which has the wider choice of gears?16 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 180-90 DT”16Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3680”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 180-90 (DT) and the MF 3680.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 180-90 DT”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3680”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 180-90 DT”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3680”AheadThe Massey Ferguson 3680 offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Fiat 180-90 (DT) does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?——No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 180-90 (DT) and the MF 3680.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 180-90 DT”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3680”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1984–19941989–1990Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson 3680 is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Massey Ferguson 3680 has 11% more hydraulic flow (5.5 L/min / 1.5 gpm) than the Fiat 180-90 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson 3680 offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Fiat 180-90 (DT) does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Massey Ferguson 3680 is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 180-90 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 3680 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources