Fiat 1380 (DT) vs J.I. Case 2096 (DT)

12 material differences

Tractor one

Fiat 1380 (DT)

1979–1984

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

J.I. Case 2096 (DT)

1984–1985

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 1380 (DT) and the 2096 (DT) → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

Field by field

12 material differences · 3 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Fiat 1380 (DT) and J.I. Case 2096 (DT), field by field
Field1380 (DT)2096 (DT)Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed133.3 hp114.1 hp+17% 1380 (DT)
Engine declaredFIAT-IVECO 8065.24.000CUMMINS B6T-590differs
Displacement declared5.50 L5.88 L+7% 2096 (DT)
Maximum torque declared317 lb·ft · 430 N·m400 lb·ft · 542 N·m+26% 2096 (DT)
Transmission
Top speed declared15.5–18.6 mph · 25–30 km/h18.6 mph · 30 km/hdiffers
Clutch declaredPedal-operated wet multi-disc driving clutch
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared14.1 gpm · 53.5 L/min23.0 gpm · 87.1 L/min+63% 2096 (DT)
Pressure declared3,336–3,481 psi · 230–240 bar
Three-point lift at ends declared10,878 lb · 4,934 kg8,250 lb · 3,742 kg+32% 1380 (DT)
Rear PTO speeds declared540/1000 rpm540/1000 rpm
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared10,748 lb · 4,875 kg11,874 lb · 5,386 kg+10% 2096 (DT)
Maximum permissible mass declared19,070 lb · 8,650 kg
Wheelbase declared108.3 in · 2,750 mm108.0 in · 2,743 mm
Length declared162.8 in · 4,135 mm171.0 in · 4,343 mm
Width declared78.0 in · 1,980 mm101.1 in · 2,567 mm+30% 2096 (DT)
Height declared108.5 in · 2,755 mm118.0 in · 2,997 mm+9% 2096 (DT)
Ground clearance declared26.2 in · 665 mm16.0 in · 406 mm+64% 1380 (DT)
Turning radius, braked declared13.9 ft · 4.25 m13.1 ft · 3.99 m+7% 1380 (DT)
Fuel tank declared190.2 qt · 180.0 L259.9 qt · 246.0 L+37% 2096 (DT)

Fiat 1380 (DT) sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 1380 (DT)”

J.I. Case 2096 (DT) sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2096”
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1896”