Ferguson TE-F 20 vs Hanomag R 324 S
8 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the TE-F 20 and the R 324 S → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
8 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | TE-F 20 | R 324 S | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 26.7 hp | 26.6 hp | — |
| Maximum torque declared | 77 lb·ft · 105 N·m | 82 lb·ft · 111 N·m | +6% R 324 S |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 12.4 mph · 20 km/h | 12.4 mph · 20 km/h | — |
| Clutch declared | Pedal operated dry single plate clutch from Borg & Beck | — | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | — | 4.2 gpm · 16.0 L/min | — |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 882 lb · 400 kg | — | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 1000 rpm | 580 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 2,701 lb · 1,225 kg | 3,902 lb · 1,770 kg | +44% R 324 S |
| Maximum permissible mass declared | — | 5,181 lb · 2,350 kg | — |
| Wheelbase declared | 70.0 in · 1,778 mm | 72.6 in · 1,845 mm | — |
| Length declared | 115.0 in · 2,921 mm | 116.1 in · 2,950 mm | — |
| Width declared | 64.0 in · 1,625 mm | 60.6 in · 1,540 mm | +6% TE-F 20 |
| Height declared | 52.0 in · 1,320 mm | 66.5 in · 1,690 mm | +28% R 324 S |
| Ground clearance declared | 13.0 in · 330 mm | 14.2 in · 360 mm | +9% R 324 S |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 9.2 ft · 2.80 m | 10.7 ft · 3.25 m | +16% R 324 S |
| Fuel tank declared | 32.8 qt · 31 L | 47.6 qt · 45 L | +45% R 324 S |
Ferguson TE-F 20 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson TEF 20”
Hanomag R 324 S sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Hanomag R 324 S”