Fendt Xylon 320 or VALMET 8100?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Xylon 320 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8100 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fendt Xylon 320 and VALMET 8100, with the call on each
QuestionXylon 3208100Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?88 kW (118 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Xylon 320”88.3 kW (118.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8100”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Xylon 320 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8100 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Xylon 320 and the 8100.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Xylon 320 and the 8100.
Which pumps more oil for implements?—67.4 L/min (17.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8100”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Xylon 320.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?5,800 kg (12,787 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Xylon 320”—No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 8100.
Which is heavier, for traction?5,480 kg (12,081 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Xylon 320”4,600 kg (10,141 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8100”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fendt Xylon 320 is 19% heavier (880 kg / 1,940 lb) than the VALMET 8100 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?—7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8100”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Xylon 320.
Which has the wider choice of gears?21Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Xylon 320”12 to 36Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8100”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Xylon 320 and the 8100.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Xylon 320”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8100”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/750/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Xylon 320”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8100”AheadThe Fendt Xylon 320 offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the VALMET 8100 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Xylon 320”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8100”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Xylon 320”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 8100”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?19901990–1996EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Fendt Xylon 320 is 19% heavier (880 kg / 1,940 lb) than the VALMET 8100 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Fendt Xylon 320 offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the VALMET 8100 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Xylon 320 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8100 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources