Fendt Fix 2 D or Kramer KL 200?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Fix 2 D has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the KL 200 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Kramer KL 200 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 45% (5.0 L/min / 1.3 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Fix 2 D | KL 200 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 12.5 kW (16.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Fix 2 D” | 13.2 kW (17.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KL 200” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Fix 2 D has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the KL 200 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Fix 2 D and the KL 200. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Fix 2 D and the KL 200. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 11.0 L/min (2.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Fix 2 D” | 16 L/min (4.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KL 200” | AheadThe Kramer KL 200 has 45% more hydraulic flow (5.0 L/min / 1.3 gpm) than the Fendt Fix 2 D (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,200 kg (2,646 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Fix 2 D” | 720 kg (1,587 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KL 200 Schmalspur” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the Fix 2 D: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Fix 2 D”); the KL 200: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KL 200 Schmalspur”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,265 kg (2,789 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Fix 2 D” | 1,270 kg (2,800 lb) to 1,430 kg (3,153 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KL 200” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 1,820 kg (4,012 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KL 200” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Fix 2 D. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 6Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Fix 2 D” | 10Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KL 200 Schmalspur” | AheadThe Kramer KL 200 has 67% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Fendt Fix 2 D (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Fix 2 D” | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the KL 200. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Fix 2 D” | 20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KL 200” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 570 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Fix 2 D” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Kramer KL 200” | No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the Fix 2 D. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | dependent (stops with the clutch)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Fix 2 D” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the KL 200. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Fix 2 D” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Kramer KL 200”; Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KL 200 Schmalspur” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1963–1967 | 1958–1967 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fendt Fix 2 D is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Kramer KL 200 has 45% more hydraulic flow (5.0 L/min / 1.3 gpm) than the Fendt Fix 2 D (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Kramer KL 200 has 67% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Fendt Fix 2 D (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Fendt Fix 2 D is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Fix 2 D has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the KL 200 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the Fix 2 D: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Fix 2 D”); the KL 200: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KL 200 Schmalspur”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources