Fendt Favorit 824 LSE or Renault Atles 926 RZ?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Favorit 824 LSE has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Atles 926 RZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Fendt Favorit 824 LSE suits road haulage better on this data: 25% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Favorit 824 LSE | Atles 926 RZ | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 169 kW (227 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 824” | 166.3 kW (223.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 926 RZ” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Favorit 824 LSE has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Atles 926 RZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Favorit 824 LSE and the Atles 926 RZ. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Favorit 824 LSE and the Atles 926 RZ. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 102.0 L/min (26.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 824” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Atles 926 RZ. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 9,180 kg (20,238 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 824” | 12,250 kg (27,007 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 926 RZ” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the Favorit 824 LSE: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 824”); the Atles 926 RZ: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 926 RZ”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 7,800 kg (17,196 lb) to 8,250 kg (18,188 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 824” | 9,690 kg (21,363 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 926 RZ” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault Atles 926 RZ is 17% heavier (1,440 kg / 3,175 lb) than the Fendt Favorit 824 LSE (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 12,000 kg (26,455 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 824” | 12,350 kg (27,227 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 926 RZ” | EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | — | 18 to 36Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 926 RZ” | No figureNo call on forward gears: no figure on record for the Favorit 824 LSE. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 824” | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Atles 926 RZ. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 824” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 926 RZ” | AheadThe Fendt Favorit 824 LSE has 25% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Renault Atles 926 RZ (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 824” | 540/1000 rpmOECD test report 2154, 2004 | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 926 RZ” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Favorit 824 LSE. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 824” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 926 RZ”; OECD test report 2154, 2004 | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1993–2004 | 2001–2004 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault Atles 926 RZ is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Renault Atles 926 RZ is 17% heavier (1,440 kg / 3,175 lb) than the Fendt Favorit 824 LSE (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Fendt Favorit 824 LSE has 25% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Renault Atles 926 RZ (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Renault Atles 926 RZ is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Favorit 824 LSE has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Atles 926 RZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the Favorit 824 LSE: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 824”); the Atles 926 RZ: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 926 RZ”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, forward gears, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources