Fendt Favorit 822 LSE or New Holland TG 210 (Traktorenlexikon)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Favorit 822 LSE has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TG 210 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The New Holland TG 210 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 40% (41.7 L/min / 11.0 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The New Holland TG 210 suits road haulage better on this data: 17% (2,000 kg / 4,409 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Favorit 822 LSE | TG 210 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 154 kW (207 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 822” | 154.5 kW (207.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG 210” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Favorit 822 LSE has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TG 210 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Favorit 822 LSE and the TG 210. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Favorit 822 LSE and the TG 210. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 104.4 L/min (27.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 822” | 146.1 L/min (38.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG 210” | AheadThe New Holland TG 210 has 40% more hydraulic flow (41.7 L/min / 11.0 gpm) than the Fendt Favorit 822 LSE (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 9,180 kg (20,238 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 822” | 4,290 kg (9,458 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG 210” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the Favorit 822 LSE: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 822”); the TG 210: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG 210”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 7,690 kg (16,954 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 822” | 9,283 kg (20,466 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG 210” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland TG 210 is 21% heavier (1,593 kg / 3,512 lb) than the Fendt Favorit 822 LSE (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 12,000 kg (26,455 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 822” | 14,000 kg (30,865 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG 210” | AheadThe New Holland TG 210 has 17% higher maximum permissible mass (2,000 kg / 4,409 lb) than the Fendt Favorit 822 LSE (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 44Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 822” | 18 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG 210” | AheadThe Fendt Favorit 822 LSE has 83% more forward gears (20 gears) than the New Holland TG 210 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 822” | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the TG 210. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 822” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG 210” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 750 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 822” | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG 210” | DifferPTO speeds differ: the Fendt Favorit 822 LSE 750/1000 rpm and the New Holland TG 210 540/1000 rpm — each offers a speed the other does not; which matters depends on the implement. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG 210” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Favorit 822 LSE. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 822” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG 210”; OECD test report 2183, 2004 | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1993–2004 | 2002–2005 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland TG 210 is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The New Holland TG 210 has 40% more hydraulic flow (41.7 L/min / 11.0 gpm) than the Fendt Favorit 822 LSE (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland TG 210 is 21% heavier (1,593 kg / 3,512 lb) than the Fendt Favorit 822 LSE (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland TG 210 has 17% higher maximum permissible mass (2,000 kg / 4,409 lb) than the Fendt Favorit 822 LSE (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- The Fendt Favorit 822 LSE has 83% more forward gears (20 gears) than the New Holland TG 210 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland TG 210 is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- PTO speeds differ: the Fendt Favorit 822 LSE 750/1000 rpm and the New Holland TG 210 540/1000 rpm — each offers a speed the other does not; which matters depends on the implement.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Favorit 822 LSE has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TG 210 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the Favorit 822 LSE: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 822”); the TG 210: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG 210”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources