Fendt Favorit 614 SA or Hürlimann H-6135?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Favorit 614 SA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the H-6135 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Hürlimann H-6135 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 69% (26.6 L/min / 7.0 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fendt Favorit 614 SA and Hürlimann H-6135, with the call on each
QuestionFavorit 614 SAH-6135Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?98.9 kW (132.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 614 SA”99.2 kW (133.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6135”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Favorit 614 SA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the H-6135 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Favorit 614 SA and the H-6135.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Favorit 614 SA and the H-6135.
Which pumps more oil for implements?38.4 L/min (10.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 614 SA”65.0 L/min (17.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6135”AheadThe Hürlimann H-6135 has 69% more hydraulic flow (26.6 L/min / 7.0 gpm) than the Fendt Favorit 614 SA (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,450 kg (9,811 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 614 SA”6,000 kg (13,228 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6135”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the Favorit 614 SA: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 614 SA”); the H-6135: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6135”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?4,945 kg (10,902 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 614 SA”5,030 kg (11,089 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6135”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 614 SA”—No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the H-6135.
Which has the wider choice of gears?16Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 614 SA”36Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6135”AheadThe Hürlimann H-6135 has 125% more forward gears (20 gears) than the Fendt Favorit 614 SA (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 614 SA”—No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the H-6135.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 614 SA”25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6135”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 614 SA”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6135”AheadThe Hürlimann H-6135 offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Fendt Favorit 614 SA does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 614 SA”—No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the H-6135.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 614 SA”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6135”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1974–19761982Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann H-6135 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Hürlimann H-6135 has 69% more hydraulic flow (26.6 L/min / 7.0 gpm) than the Fendt Favorit 614 SA (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann H-6135 has 125% more forward gears (20 gears) than the Fendt Favorit 614 SA (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann H-6135 offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Fendt Favorit 614 SA does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Hürlimann H-6135 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Favorit 614 SA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the H-6135 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the Favorit 614 SA: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 614 SA”); the H-6135: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6135”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources