Fendt Favorit 611 SA or Ford 8100 A?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Favorit 611 SA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8100 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Fendt Favorit 611 SA suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fendt Favorit 611 SA and Ford 8100 A, with the call on each
QuestionFavorit 611 SA8100 ACall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?76.9 kW (103.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 611 SA”77 kW (103 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8100”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Favorit 611 SA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8100 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Favorit 611 SA and the 8100 A.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Favorit 611 SA and the 8100 A.
Which pumps more oil for implements?37.6 L/min (9.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 611 SA”35.0 L/min (9.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8100”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,600 kg (7,937 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 611 SA”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 8100 A.
Which is heavier, for traction?4,435 kg (9,778 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 611 SA”4,825 kg (10,637 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8100”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?6,500 kg (14,330 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 611 SA”6,800 kg (14,991 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8100”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?16Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8100”No figureNo call on forward gears: no figure on record for the Favorit 611 SA.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 611 SA”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 8100 A.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 611 SA”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 8100”AheadThe Fendt Favorit 611 SA has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Ford 8100 A (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 611 SA”540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 8100”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 8100”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Favorit 611 SA.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 611 SA”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 8100”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1972–19761978–1981Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Ford 8100 A is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Fendt Favorit 611 SA has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Ford 8100 A (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Ford 8100 A is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Favorit 611 SA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8100 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, forward gears, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources