Fendt Favorit 509 C or Hürlimann 909 XT?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Favorit 509 C has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 909 XT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Fendt Favorit 509C suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 64% (39.2 L/min / 10.4 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Favorit 509 C | 909 XT | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 69.5 kW (93.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 509 C” | 69.8 kW (93.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 909” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Favorit 509 C has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 909 XT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Favorit 509 C and the 909 XT. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Favorit 509 C and the 909 XT. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 100.2 L/min (26.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 509 C” | 61.0 L/min (16.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 909” | AheadThe Fendt Favorit 509C has 64% more hydraulic flow (39.2 L/min / 10.4 gpm) than the Hürlimann 909 XT (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | 2,550 kg (5,622 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 909” | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the Favorit 509 C. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 4,970 kg (10,957 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 509 C” | 4,300 kg (9,480 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 909” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fendt Favorit 509C is 16% heavier (670 kg / 1,477 lb) than the Hürlimann 909 XT (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Favorit 509 C and the 909 XT. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 20 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 509 C” | 45 to 60Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 909” | AheadThe Hürlimann 909 XT has 88% more forward gears (21 gears) than the Fendt Favorit 509C (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 509 C” | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 909 XT. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 509 C” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 909” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpm / 750 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 509 C” | 540/1000/540E/1000E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 909” | AheadThe Fendt Favorit 509C offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the Hürlimann 909 XT does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Favorit 509 C and the 909 XT. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 509 C” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 909” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1994–2000 | 1995–2004 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Fendt Favorit 509C has 64% more hydraulic flow (39.2 L/min / 10.4 gpm) than the Hürlimann 909 XT (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Fendt Favorit 509C is 16% heavier (670 kg / 1,477 lb) than the Hürlimann 909 XT (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann 909 XT has 88% more forward gears (21 gears) than the Fendt Favorit 509C (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Fendt Favorit 509C offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the Hürlimann 909 XT does not (as stated by the sources).
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Favorit 509 C has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 909 XT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources