Fendt Farmer 275 S/SA or Fiat 72-94 (DT)?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fendt Farmer 275 S/SA and Fiat 72-94 (DT), with the call on each
QuestionFarmer 275 S/SA72-94 (DT)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?46.6 kW (62.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 275 S/SA”46.5 kW (62.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 72-94”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Farmer 275 S/SA and the 72-94 (DT).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Farmer 275 S/SA and the 72-94 (DT).
Which pumps more oil for implements?41.1 L/min (10.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 275 S/SA”44.5 L/min (11.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 72-94”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,500 kg (7,716 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 72-94”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the Farmer 275 S/SA.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,680 kg (5,908 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 275 S/SA”3,460 kg (7,628 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 72-94”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fiat 72-94 (DT) is 29% heavier (780 kg / 1,720 lb) than the Fendt Farmer 275 S/SA (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?5,300 kg (11,684 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 72-94”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Farmer 275 S/SA.
Which has the wider choice of gears?21Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 275 S/SA”12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 72-94”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Farmer 275 S/SA and the 72-94 (DT).
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 275 S/SA”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 72-94”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/750 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 275 S/SA”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 72-94”DifferPTO speeds differ: the Fendt Farmer 275 S/SA 540/750 rpm and the Fiat 72-94 (DT) 540/1000 rpm — each offers a speed the other does not; which matters depends on the implement.
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 72-94”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Farmer 275 S/SA.
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 275 S/SA”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri 72-94”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1988–19961993–1996Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fiat 72-94 (DT) is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Fiat 72-94 (DT) is 29% heavier (780 kg / 1,720 lb) than the Fendt Farmer 275 S/SA (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Fiat 72-94 (DT) is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • PTO speeds differ: the Fendt Farmer 275 S/SA 540/750 rpm and the Fiat 72-94 (DT) 540/1000 rpm — each offers a speed the other does not; which matters depends on the implement.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources