Fendt 209 FA vs New Holland TN 95 DA
8 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 209 FA and the TN 95 DA → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
8 material differences · 5 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 209 FA | TN 95 DA | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 89 hp | 89 hp | — |
| Maximum torque declared | 250 lb·ft · 339 N·m | 268 lb·ft · 364 N·m | +7% TN 95 DA |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 24.9 mph · 40 km/h | 24.9 mph · 40 km/h | — |
| Clutch declared | Dry multi-disc clutch | Oil-immersed multi-plate clutch with six plates of 113 mm diameter | differs |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Hydraulic control declared | — | Constant flow | — |
| Pump flow declared | 19.5 gpm · 74.0 L/min | 12.5 gpm · 47.4 L/min | +56% 209 FA |
| Pressure declared | 2,901 psi · 200 bar | — | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540/750/1000 rpm | 540/1000 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 6,085 lb · 2,760 kg | 6,724 lb · 3,050 kg | +11% TN 95 DA |
| Maximum permissible mass declared | 8,818 lb · 4,000 kg | — | — |
| Wheelbase declared | 86.1 in · 2,187 mm | 86.0 in · 2,185 mm | — |
| Length declared | 139.5 in · 3,544 mm | 140.5 in · 3,568 mm | — |
| Width declared | 54.0 in · 1,372 mm | 79.1 in · 2,010 mm | +47% TN 95 DA |
| Height declared | 95.3 in · 2,420 mm | 92.1 in · 2,340 mm | — |
| Ground clearance declared | 8.7 in · 220 mm | 14.2 in · 360 mm | +64% TN 95 DA |
| Fuel tank declared | 74.0 qt · 70 L | 93.0 qt · 88 L | +26% TN 95 DA |
Fendt 209 FA sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 209 FA”
New Holland TN 95 DA sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN95 DA”
- Source: OECD test report 2346, 2006