Fendt 208 FA vs John Deere 6120
9 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
We will not advise between these two machines, because their unladen weight differs by more than 25% (56%). The figures below are side by side so you can judge them yourself; each says whether it was measured, claimed or declared by its source.
Field by field
9 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 208 FA | 6120 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 79 hp | 79.0 hp | — |
| Engine declared | — | John Deere PowrTech 4.045 TL-070 | — |
| Displacement declared | — | 4.53 L | — |
| Maximum torque declared | 234 lb·ft · 317 N·m | 232 lb·ft · 314 N·m | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 24.9 mph · 40 km/h | 24.9 mph · 40 km/h | — |
| Clutch declared | dry multi-plate clutch | — | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Hydraulic centre declared | — | Closed centre | — |
| Hydraulic control declared | Load sensing | Load sensing | — |
| Pump flow declared | 19.5 gpm · 74.0 L/min | — | — |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | — | 10,251 lb · 4,650 kg | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540/750/1000 rpm | 540/1000 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 6,085 lb · 2,760 kg | 9,513 lb · 4,315 kg | +56% 6120 |
| Maximum permissible mass declared | 8,818 lb · 4,000 kg | 15,432 lb · 7,000 kg | +75% 6120 |
| Wheelbase declared | 86.1 in · 2,187 mm | 94.5 in · 2,400 mm | +10% 6120 |
| Length declared | 139.5 in · 3,544 mm | 168.4 in · 4,278 mm | +21% 6120 |
| Width declared | 54.0 in · 1,372 mm | 85.7 in · 2,178 mm | +59% 6120 |
| Height declared | 95.3 in · 2,420 mm | 104.3 in · 2,648 mm | +9% 6120 |
| Ground clearance declared | 8.7 in · 220 mm | 19.3 in · 490 mm | +123% 6120 |
| Fuel tank declared | 74.0 qt · 70 L | 174.4 qt · 165.0 L | +136% 6120 |
Fendt 208 FA sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 208 FA”
John Deere 6120 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6120”
- Source: OECD test report 1821, 1999