Fendt Farmer 204 P vs VALMET 565/II

14 material differences

Tractor one

1979–1987

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1992–1997

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the Farmer 204 P and the 565/II → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

14 material differences · 1 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Fendt Farmer 204 P and VALMET 565/II, field by field
Field	Farmer 204 P	565/II	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	63.8 hp	74.0 hp	+16% 565/II
Engine declared	KHD F4L 912	VALMET 320 DS	differs
Displacement declared	3.77 L	3.30 L	+14% Farmer 204 P
Maximum torque declared	185 lb·ft · 251 N·m	203 lb·ft · 275 N·m	+10% 565/II
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	Air-cooled double dry clutch	Dry LuK double clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared	—	Open centre	—
Pump flow declared	8.6 gpm · 32.7 L/min	14.5 gpm · 55.0 L/min	+68% 565/II
Pressure declared	—	2,901 psi · 200 bar	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	—	5,688 lb · 2,580 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540 rpm	540E/540 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	5,159 lb · 2,340 kg	6,834 lb · 3,100 kg	+32% 565/II
Wheelbase declared	85.2 in · 2,165 mm	88.8 in · 2,255 mm	—
Length declared	144.5 in · 3,670 mm	152.4 in · 3,870 mm	+5% 565/II
Width declared	54.6 in · 1,388 mm	79.9 in · 2,030 mm	+46% 565/II
Height declared	89.1 in · 2,263 mm	104.5 in · 2,655 mm	+17% 565/II
Ground clearance declared	13.8 in · 350 mm	18.1 in · 460 mm	+31% 565/II
Turning radius, braked declared	11.4 ft · 3.46 m	13.8 ft · 4.20 m	+21% 565/II
Fuel tank declared	67.6 qt · 64 L	77.1 qt · 73.0 L	+14% 565/II

Source

Source