Fendt Farmer 204 P vs Massey Ferguson MF 372 (A)

8 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1979–1987

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1992–1997

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the Farmer 204 P and the MF 372 (A) → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

8 material differences · 5 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Fendt Farmer 204 P and Massey Ferguson MF 372 (A), field by field
Field	Farmer 204 P	MF 372 (A)	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	63.8 hp	70.1 hp	+10% MF 372 (A)
Engine declared	KHD F4L 912	Perkins A 4.236	differs
Displacement declared	3.77 L	3.87 L	—
Maximum torque declared	185 lb·ft · 251 N·m	181 lb·ft · 246 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	Air-cooled double dry clutch	—	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	8.6 gpm · 32.7 L/min	16.9 gpm · 64.0 L/min	+96% MF 372 (A)
Pressure declared	—	2,466 psi · 170 bar	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	—	4,729 lb · 2,145 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540 rpm	540 rpm / 1000 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	5,159 lb · 2,340 kg	6,173 lb · 2,800 kg	+20% MF 372 (A)
Wheelbase declared	85.2 in · 2,165 mm	87.3 in · 2,217 mm	—
Length declared	144.5 in · 3,670 mm	147.0 in · 3,734 mm	—
Width declared	54.6 in · 1,388 mm	75.2 in · 1,910 mm	+38% MF 372 (A)
Height declared	89.1 in · 2,263 mm	98.1 in · 2,492 mm	+10% MF 372 (A)
Ground clearance declared	13.8 in · 350 mm	14.2 in · 360 mm	—
Turning radius, braked declared	11.4 ft · 3.46 m	—	—
Fuel tank declared	67.6 qt · 64 L	79.3 qt · 75.0 L	+17% MF 372 (A)

Source

Source