Fendt Farmer 204 P vs Massey Ferguson MF 3050 E

11 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1979–1987

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1988–1995

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the Farmer 204 P and the MF 3050 E → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

11 material differences · 2 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Fendt Farmer 204 P and Massey Ferguson MF 3050 E, field by field
Field	Farmer 204 P	MF 3050 E	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	63.8 hp	70.1 hp	+10% MF 3050 E
Engine declared	KHD F4L 912	Perkins A 4.236 LD	differs
Displacement declared	3.77 L	3.86 L	—
Maximum torque declared	185 lb·ft · 251 N·m	187 lb·ft · 253 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	15.5 mph · 25 km/h	+20% Farmer 204 P
Clutch declared	Air-cooled double dry clutch	pedal-operated, dry and air-cooled VALEO single-plate clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	8.6 gpm · 32.7 L/min	—	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	—	6,351 lb · 2,881 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540 rpm	540/1000 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	5,159 lb · 2,340 kg	7,848 lb · 3,560 kg	+52% MF 3050 E
Wheelbase declared	85.2 in · 2,165 mm	93.3 in · 2,371 mm	+10% MF 3050 E
Length declared	144.5 in · 3,670 mm	155.5 in · 3,950 mm	+8% MF 3050 E
Width declared	54.6 in · 1,388 mm	78.3 in · 1,990 mm	+43% MF 3050 E
Height declared	89.1 in · 2,263 mm	103.1 in · 2,620 mm	+16% MF 3050 E
Ground clearance declared	13.8 in · 350 mm	14.6 in · 370 mm	+6% MF 3050 E
Turning radius, braked declared	11.4 ft · 3.46 m	—	—
Fuel tank declared	67.6 qt · 64 L	156.4 qt · 148.0 L	+131% MF 3050 E

Source

Source