Fendt Farmer 102 vs Ford 2000 Dexta (A)
9 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the Farmer 102 and the 2000 Dexta (A) → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
9 material differences · 2 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | Farmer 102 | 2000 Dexta (A) | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 39.3 hp | 39.3 hp | — |
| Engine declared | 3 D 325-3 | — | — |
| Displacement declared | 2.55 L | — | — |
| Maximum torque declared | — | 112 lb·ft · 152 N·m | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 16.0 mph · 25.8 km/h | 12.4–18.6 mph · 20–30 km/h | differs |
| Clutch declared | Double-sprung Tornado single-disc dry clutch for normal driving | — | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 8.0 gpm · 30.5 L/min | — | — |
| Pressure declared | 2,489 psi · 172 bar | — | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 559 rpm | 540 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 5,049 lb · 2,290 kg | 4,123 lb · 1,870 kg | +22% Farmer 102 |
| Maximum permissible mass declared | 8,433 lb · 3,825 kg | — | — |
| Wheelbase declared | 82.0 in · 2,083 mm | 76.0 in · 1,930 mm | +8% Farmer 102 |
| Length declared | 142.7 in · 3,625 mm | 126.4 in · 3,210 mm | +13% Farmer 102 |
| Width declared | 67.2 in · 1,706 mm | 63.8 in · 1,620 mm | +5% Farmer 102 |
| Height declared | 92.7 in · 2,354 mm | 89.8 in · 2,280 mm | — |
| Ground clearance declared | 15.2 in · 385 mm | 19.7 in · 500 mm | +30% 2000 Dexta (A) |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 12.0 ft · 3.65 m | 9.8 ft · 3.00 m | +22% Farmer 102 |
| Fuel tank declared | 68.7 qt · 65 L | 51.8 qt · 49 L | +33% Farmer 102 |
Fendt Farmer 102 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 102”
Ford 2000 Dexta (A) sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 2000 S”