Fendt 933 Vario vs John Deere 8295 RT
4 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
We will not advise between these two machines, because their unladen weight differs by more than 25% (52%); the drive differs (4WD; Tracks); they were not built in overlapping years (2006–2006; 2009–2009); the 8295 RT is on tracks, not an alternative to an ordinary tractor. The figures below are side by side so you can judge them yourself; each says whether it was measured, claimed or declared by its source.
Field by field
4 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 933 Vario | 8295 RT | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 295 hp | 291 hp | — |
| Maximum torque declared | 966 lb·ft · 1,310 N·m | 966 lb·ft · 1,310 N·m | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 31.1–37.3 mph · 50–60 km/h | 24.9 mph · 40 km/h | differs |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Hydraulic centre declared | — | Closed centre | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540/1000 rpm | 1000 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 22,619 lb · 10,260 kg | 34,392 lb · 15,600 kg | +52% 8295 RT |
| Maximum permissible mass declared | 39,683 lb · 18,000 kg | — | — |
| Wheelbase declared | 120.1 in · 3,050 mm | — | — |
| Length declared | 222.6 in · 5,655 mm | 231.9 in · 5,890 mm | — |
| Width declared | 108.3 in · 2,750 mm | 115.0 in · 2,920 mm | +6% 8295 RT |
| Height declared | 130.8 in · 3,322 mm | 130.7 in · 3,320 mm | — |
| Ground clearance declared | 22.4 in · 570 mm | — | — |
Fendt 933 Vario sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 933 Vario”
- Source: OECD test report 2543, 2010
John Deere 8295 RT sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8295 RT”
- Source: OECD test report 2589, 2011