Fendt 820 Vario vs Fendt 924 Vario

13 material differences

Tractor one

Fendt 820 Vario

2006–2011

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

Fendt 924 Vario

2006–2014

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 820 Vario and the 924 Vario → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

Field by field

13 material differences · 2 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Fendt 820 Vario and Fendt 924 Vario, field by field
Field820 Vario924 VarioGap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed202 hp207 hp
Engine declaredDeutz AG TCD 2012 LO6 4VDeutz TCD 2013 LO6 4Vdiffers
Displacement declared6.06 L7.14 L+18% 924 Vario
Maximum torque declared660 lb·ft · 895 N·m738 lb·ft · 1,000 N·m+12% 924 Vario
Transmission
Top speed declared31.1 mph · 50 km/h31.1–37.3 mph · 50–60 km/hdiffers
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic control declaredLoad sensingLoad sensing
Pressure declared2,901 psi · 200 bar
Three-point lift at ends declared20,413 lb · 9,259 kg
Rear PTO speeds declared540/540E/1000 rpm540/1000 rpmdiffers
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared15,840 lb · 7,185 kg22,223 lb · 10,080 kg+40% 924 Vario
Maximum permissible mass declared33,069–39,683 lb · 15,000–18,000 kg
Wheelbase declared107.1 in · 2,720 mm120.1 in · 3,050 mm+12% 924 Vario
Length declared187.1 in · 4,753 mm222.6 in · 5,655 mm+19% 924 Vario
Width declared101.2 in · 2,570 mm108.3 in · 2,750 mm+7% 924 Vario
Height declared119.1 in · 3,025 mm130.8 in · 3,322 mm+10% 924 Vario
Ground clearance declared22.3 in · 566 mm18.9 in · 480 mm+18% 820 Vario
Turning radius, braked declared18.4 ft · 5.60 m19.9 ft · 6.08 m+9% 924 Vario
Fuel tank declared359.3 qt · 340 L697.4 qt · 660 L+94% 924 Vario

Fendt 820 Vario sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 820 Vario”
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 718 Vario”

Fendt 924 Vario sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 924 Vario”
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 922 Vario”
  • Source: OECD test report 2545, 2010