Fendt 313 Vario vs New Holland T 6050 RC/PC
8 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 313 Vario and the T 6050 RC/PC → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
8 material differences · 1 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 313 Vario | T 6050 RC/PC | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | — | 125.3 hp | — |
| Maximum torque declared | — | 411 lb·ft · 557 N·m | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 24.9 mph · 40 km/h | 24.9–31.1 mph · 40–50 km/h | differs |
| Clutch declared | — | Electro-hydraulically operated wet CASE-NEW HOLLAND multi-disc clutch | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Hydraulic control declared | Load sensing | — | — |
| Pump flow declared | — | 27.7 gpm · 104.9 L/min | — |
| Pressure declared | — | 3,046 psi · 210 bar | — |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | — | 18,204 lb · 8,257 kg | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | — | 540/540E/1000 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 9,811 lb · 4,450 kg | 13,426 lb · 6,090 kg | +37% T 6050 RC/PC |
| Maximum permissible mass declared | 18,739 lb · 8,500 kg | 23,149 lb · 10,500 kg | +24% T 6050 RC/PC |
| Wheelbase declared | 95.3 in · 2,420 mm | 107.6 in · 2,734 mm | +13% T 6050 RC/PC |
| Length declared | 163.4 in · 4,150 mm | 210.5 in · 5,347 mm | +29% T 6050 RC/PC |
| Width declared | 93.9 in · 2,385 mm | 87.8 in · 2,230 mm | +7% 313 Vario |
| Height declared | 110.2 in · 2,800 mm | 119.7 in · 3,040 mm | +9% T 6050 RC/PC |
| Ground clearance declared | 20.1 in · 510 mm | 19.1 in · 486 mm | — |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 12.8 ft · 3.90 m | — | — |
| Fuel tank declared | 221.9 qt · 210 L | 301.2 qt · 285.0 L | +36% T 6050 RC/PC |
Fendt 313 Vario sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 313 Vario”
New Holland T 6050 RC/PC sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T6050 RC und PC”