Fahr D 181 or International Harvester 323?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the International Harvester 323 is ahead on forward gears and top speed.

  • The International Harvester 323 suits road haulage better on this data: 56% (7.2 km/h / 4.5 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fahr D 181 and International Harvester 323, with the call on each
QuestionD 181323Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?17.7 kW (24 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 181”17.5 kW (23.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick 323”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the D 181 and the 323.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the D 181 and the 323.
Which pumps more oil for implements?25.0 L/min (6.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick 323”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the D 181.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?690 kg (1,521 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 181”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 323.
Which is heavier, for traction?1,260 kg (2,778 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 181”1,876 kg (4,136 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick 323”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The International Harvester 323 is 49% heavier (616 kg / 1,358 lb) than the Fahr D 181 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?1,950 kg (4,299 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 181”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 323.
Which has the wider choice of gears?4 to 5Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 181”8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick 323”AheadThe International Harvester 323 has 60% more forward gears (3 gears) than the Fahr D 181 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the D 181 and the 323.
Which is faster on the road?12.8 km/h (8.0 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 181”20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick 323”AheadThe International Harvester 323 has 56% more top speed (7.2 km/h / 4.5 mph) than the Fahr D 181 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?600 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 181”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “McCormick 323”No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the D 181.
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “McCormick 323”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the D 181.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 181”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “McCormick 323”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1955–19581966–1974Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The International Harvester 323 is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The International Harvester 323 is 49% heavier (616 kg / 1,358 lb) than the Fahr D 181 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The International Harvester 323 has 60% more forward gears (3 gears) than the Fahr D 181 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The International Harvester 323 has 56% more top speed (7.2 km/h / 4.5 mph) than the Fahr D 181 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The International Harvester 323 is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources