Eicher EM 300/2 Königstiger or International Harvester International 340?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the EM 300/2 Königstiger has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the International 340 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The International Harvester International 340 suits road haulage better on this data: 26% (5.2 km/h / 3.2 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | EM 300/2 Königstiger | International 340 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 27.8 kW (37.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher EM 300/2 Königstiger” | 27.9 kW (37.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 340” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the EM 300/2 Königstiger has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the International 340 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the EM 300/2 Königstiger and the International 340. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the EM 300/2 Königstiger and the International 340. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 36.1 L/min (9.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 340” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the EM 300/2 Königstiger. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 900 kg (1,984 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher EM 300/2 Königstiger” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the International 340. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,850 kg (4,079 lb) to 1,865 kg (4,112 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher EM 300/2 Königstiger” | 2,356 kg (5,194 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 340” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The International Harvester International 340 is 26% heavier (491 kg / 1,082 lb) than the Eicher EM 300/2 Königstiger (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 2,500 kg (5,512 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher EM 300/2 Königstiger” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the International 340. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher EM 300/2 Königstiger” | 5 to 10Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 340” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Eicher EM 300/2 Königstiger” | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the International 340. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 19.8 km/h (12.3 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher EM 300/2 Königstiger” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 340” | AheadThe International Harvester International 340 has 26% more top speed (5.2 km/h / 3.2 mph) than the Eicher EM 300/2 Königstiger (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 558/1116 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Eicher EM 300/2 Königstiger” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 340” | No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the EM 300/2 Königstiger. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Eicher EM 300/2 Königstiger” | dependent (stops with the clutch)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 340” | AheadThe Eicher EM 300/2 Königstiger has an independent PTO; the International Harvester International 340’s is dependent (stops with the clutch). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Eicher EM 300/2 Königstiger” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 340” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1963–1968 | 1958–1963 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Eicher EM 300/2 Königstiger is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The International Harvester International 340 is 26% heavier (491 kg / 1,082 lb) than the Eicher EM 300/2 Königstiger (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The International Harvester International 340 has 26% more top speed (5.2 km/h / 3.2 mph) than the Eicher EM 300/2 Königstiger (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Eicher EM 300/2 Königstiger has an independent PTO; the International Harvester International 340’s is dependent (stops with the clutch).
- The Eicher EM 300/2 Königstiger is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the EM 300/2 Königstiger has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the International 340 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO speeds.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources