Eicher 3133 or Ford 9000?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Ford 9000: hydraulic flow. On features, the Eicher 3133 is ahead on PTO speeds and drive.

  • The Eicher 3133 suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 540 rpm.
  • The Ford 9000 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 44% (18.6 L/min / 4.9 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The Eicher 3133 suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: 25% (1,105 kg / 2,436 lb) heavier and four-wheel drive.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Eicher 3133 and Ford 9000, with the call on each
Question31339000Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?94 kW (126 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3133”94.0 kW (126.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 9000”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 3133 and the 9000.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 3133 and the 9000.
Which pumps more oil for implements?42.0 L/min (11.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3133”60.6 L/min (16.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 9000”AheadThe Ford 9000 has 44% more hydraulic flow (18.6 L/min / 4.9 gpm) than the Eicher 3133 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,181 kg (9,217 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3133”3,200 kg (7,055 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 9000”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 3133: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3133”); the 9000: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 9000”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?5,550 kg (12,236 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3133”4,445 kg (9,800 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 9000”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Eicher 3133 is 25% heavier (1,105 kg / 2,436 lb) than the Ford 9000 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3133”—No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 9000.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3133”8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 9000”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3133”—No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 9000.
Which is faster on the road?31.5 km/h (19.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3133”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 9000”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3133”1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 9000”AheadThe Eicher 3133 offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Ford 9000 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?—independentTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 9000”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 3133.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3133”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 9000”AheadThe Eicher 3133 is available with four-wheel drive; the Ford 9000 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1977–19821969–1972Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Eicher 3133 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Ford 9000 has 44% more hydraulic flow (18.6 L/min / 4.9 gpm) than the Eicher 3133 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Eicher 3133 is 25% heavier (1,105 kg / 2,436 lb) than the Ford 9000 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Eicher 3133 offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Ford 9000 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Eicher 3133 is available with four-wheel drive; the Ford 9000 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • The Eicher 3133 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the 3133: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3133”); the 9000: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 9000”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources