Eicher Mammut 3012 A vs Massey Ferguson MF 174 (A)

7 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1969–1970

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1973–1983

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the Mammut 3012 A and the MF 174 (A) → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

7 material differences · 5 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Eicher Mammut 3012 A and Massey Ferguson MF 174 (A), field by field
Field	Mammut 3012 A	MF 174 (A)	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	60.9 hp	60.2 hp	—
Engine declared	—	Perkins A 4.236	—
Displacement declared	—	3.87 L	—
Maximum torque declared	183 lb·ft · 248 N·m	183 lb·ft · 248 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	12.4 mph · 20 km/h	15.5 mph · 25 km/h	+25% MF 174 (A)
Clutch declared	Eicher dual clutch	Pedal-operated dry LUK double clutch with 279 mm diameter	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	10.6 gpm · 40.0 L/min	—	—
Pressure declared	2,134 psi · 147 bar	2,589 psi · 178 bar	+21% MF 174 (A)
Three-point lift at ends declared	—	3,362 lb · 1,525 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540/1000 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	6,923 lb · 3,140 kg	4,872 lb · 2,210 kg	+42% Mammut 3012 A
Wheelbase declared	89.6 in · 2,277 mm	87.0 in · 2,210 mm	—
Length declared	139.8 in · 3,550 mm	142.5 in · 3,620 mm	—
Width declared	74.8 in · 1,900 mm	—	—
Height declared	66.1 in · 1,680 mm	55.9 in · 1,420 mm	+18% Mammut 3012 A
Ground clearance declared	11.0 in · 280 mm	—	—
Turning radius, braked declared	13.9 ft · 4.25 m	10.9 ft · 3.31 m	+28% Mammut 3012 A
Fuel tank declared	100.4 qt · 95 L	64.5 qt · 61.0 L	+56% Mammut 3012 A

Source

Source