Deutz (KHD) MTZ 320 vs MASSEY-HARRIS 202
7 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
We will not advise between these two machines, because their unladen weight differs by more than 25% (36%); they were not built in overlapping years (1932–1936; 1940–1942). The figures below are side by side so you can judge them yourself; each says whether it was measured, claimed or declared by its source.
Field by field
7 material differences · 2 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | MTZ 320 | 202 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 35.4 hp | 36.5 hp | — |
| Engine declared | — | CONTINENTAL M-290 | — |
| Displacement declared | — | 4.75 L | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 11.3 mph · 18.2 km/h | 12.4 mph · 20 km/h | +10% 202 |
| Clutch declared | — | Pedal operated dry Borg & Beck single plate clutch | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Rear PTO speeds declared | — | 540 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 8,863 lb · 4,020 kg | 6,499 lb · 2,948 kg | +36% MTZ 320 |
| Wheelbase declared | 70.1 in · 1,780 mm | 89.0 in · 2,261 mm | +27% 202 |
| Length declared | 116.1 in · 2,950 mm | 139.5 in · 3,543 mm | +20% 202 |
| Width declared | 72.4 in · 1,840 mm | 69.0 in · 1,753 mm | — |
| Height declared | 74.8 in · 1,900 mm | 59.3 in · 1,505 mm | +26% MTZ 320 |
| Ground clearance declared | 13.8 in · 350 mm | 12.8 in · 324 mm | +8% MTZ 320 |
| Fuel tank declared | 52.8 qt · 50 L | 120.5 qt · 114.0 L | +128% 202 |
Deutz (KHD) MTZ 320 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz MTZ 320”
MASSEY-HARRIS 202 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Massey-Harris Massey-Harris 202”