Deutz (KHD) Intrac 2002 or Landini R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A"?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Intrac 2002 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Intrac 2002 | R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 37.3 kW (50.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz INTRAC 2002” | 36.8 kW (49.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 5500” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Intrac 2002 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Intrac 2002 and the R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A". |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Intrac 2002 and the R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A". |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 28.6 L/min (7.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 5500” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Intrac 2002. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,100 kg (4,630 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz INTRAC 2002” | 2,050 kg (4,519 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 5500” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,680 kg (5,908 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz INTRAC 2002” | 2,010 kg (4,431 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 5500” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz Intrac 2002 is 33% heavier (670 kg / 1,477 lb) than the Landini R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Intrac 2002 and the R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A". |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | — | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 5500” | No figureNo call on forward gears: no figure on record for the Intrac 2002. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Intrac 2002 and the R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A". |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz INTRAC 2002” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 5500” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz INTRAC 2002” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 5500” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz INTRAC 2002” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A". |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz INTRAC 2002” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 5500” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1972–1974 | 1973–1983 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Deutz Intrac 2002 is 33% heavier (670 kg / 1,477 lb) than the Landini R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Intrac 2002 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R-5500 (DT) "TL 22 N/A" has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, forward gears, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources