Deutz-Fahr IN-trac 6.60 Turbo or Lamborghini Champion 150 (Traktorenlexikon)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the IN-trac 6.60 Turbo has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Champion 150 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Lamborghini Champion 150 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 95% (53.0 L/min / 14.0 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Deutz-Fahr IN-trac 6.60 Turbo and Lamborghini Champion 150 (Traktorenlexikon), with the call on each
QuestionIN-trac 6.60 TurboChampion 150Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?110 kW (148 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr IN-trac 6.60 turbo”110.3 kW (147.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Champion 150”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the IN-trac 6.60 Turbo has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Champion 150 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the IN-trac 6.60 Turbo and the Champion 150.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the IN-trac 6.60 Turbo and the Champion 150.
Which pumps more oil for implements?56.0 L/min (14.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr IN-trac 6.60 turbo”109.0 L/min (28.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Champion 150”AheadThe Lamborghini Champion 150 has 95% more hydraulic flow (53.0 L/min / 14.0 gpm) than the Deutz-Fahr IN-trac 6.60 Turbo (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?8,600 kg (18,960 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Champion 150”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the IN-trac 6.60 Turbo.
Which is heavier, for traction?6,300 kg (13,889 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr IN-trac 6.60 turbo”7,250 kg (15,984 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Champion 150”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Lamborghini Champion 150 is 15% heavier (950 kg / 2,094 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr IN-trac 6.60 Turbo (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?10,000 kg (22,046 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr IN-trac 6.60 turbo”10,500 kg (23,149 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Champion 150”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?18 to 30Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr IN-trac 6.60 turbo”18 to 27Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Champion 150”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr IN-trac 6.60 turbo”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Champion 150.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr IN-trac 6.60 turbo”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Champion 150”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr IN-trac 6.60 turbo”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Champion 150”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Champion 150”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the IN-trac 6.60 Turbo.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr IN-trac 6.60 turbo”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Champion 150”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1986–19911998–2004Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Lamborghini Champion 150 is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Lamborghini Champion 150 has 95% more hydraulic flow (53.0 L/min / 14.0 gpm) than the Deutz-Fahr IN-trac 6.60 Turbo (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Lamborghini Champion 150 is 15% heavier (950 kg / 2,094 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr IN-trac 6.60 Turbo (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Lamborghini Champion 150 is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the IN-trac 6.60 Turbo has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Champion 150 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources