Deutz-Fahr DX 4.10 or VALMET 605/605-4?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the VALMET 605/605-4: hydraulic flow.

  • The VALMET 605/605-4 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 32% (12.7 L/min / 3.4 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Deutz-Fahr DX 4.10 and VALMET 605/605-4, with the call on each
QuestionDX 4.10605/605-4Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?48 kW (64 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 4.10”48.2 kW (64.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 605”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the DX 4.10 and the 605/605-4.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the DX 4.10 and the 605/605-4.
Which pumps more oil for implements?40.0 L/min (10.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 4.10”52.7 L/min (13.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 605”AheadThe VALMET 605/605-4 has 32% more hydraulic flow (12.7 L/min / 3.4 gpm) than the Deutz-Fahr DX 4.10 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,800 kg (8,378 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 4.10”3,946 kg (8,699 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 605”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?3,920 kg (8,642 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 4.10”3,440 kg (7,584 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 605”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr DX 4.10 is 14% heavier (480 kg / 1,058 lb) than the VALMET 605/605-4 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the DX 4.10 and the 605/605-4.
Which has the wider choice of gears?15 to 18Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 4.10”8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 605”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the DX 4.10 and the 605/605-4.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 4.10”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 605”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 4.10”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 605”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 4.10”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 605”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 4.10”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 605”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1985–19881983–1989EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The VALMET 605/605-4 has 32% more hydraulic flow (12.7 L/min / 3.4 gpm) than the Deutz-Fahr DX 4.10 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr DX 4.10 is 14% heavier (480 kg / 1,058 lb) than the VALMET 605/605-4 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources