Deutz-Fahr DX 3.70 or Renault 68-12 RS?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Renault 68-12 RS: three-point lift. On features, the Deutz-Fahr DX 3.70 is ahead on drive.

  • The Renault 68-12 RS suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 15% (400 kg / 882 lb) more three-point lift.
  • The Deutz-Fahr DX 3.70 suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Deutz-Fahr DX 3.70 and Renault 68-12 RS, with the call on each
QuestionDX 3.7068-12 RSCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?44.5 kW (59.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.70”44.6 kW (59.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 68-12 RA/RS R7721”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the DX 3.70 and the 68-12 RS.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the DX 3.70 and the 68-12 RS.
Which pumps more oil for implements?41.2 L/min (10.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 68-12 RA/RS R7721”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the DX 3.70.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,600 kg (5,732 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.70”3,000 kg (6,614 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 68-12 RA/RS R7721”AheadThe Renault 68-12 RS has 15% more lift (400 kg / 882 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr DX 3.70 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?3,140 kg (6,923 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.70”3,040 kg (6,702 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 68-12 RA/RS R7721”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?5,000 kg (11,023 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.70”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 68-12 RS.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.70”12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 68-12 RA/RS R7721”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the DX 3.70 and the 68-12 RS.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.70”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 68-12 RA/RS R7721”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.70”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 68-12 RA/RS R7721”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the DX 3.70 and the 68-12 RS.
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.70”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 68-12 RA/RS R7721”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr DX 3.70 is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 68-12 RS is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1984–19891983–1987EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Renault 68-12 RS has 15% more lift (400 kg / 882 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr DX 3.70 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr DX 3.70 is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 68-12 RS is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources