Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50 or ZETOR 7211/7245?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the ZETOR 7211/7245: hydraulic flow. On features, the Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50 is ahead on top speed.

  • The ZETOR 7211/7245 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 49% (18.6 L/min / 4.9 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50 suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50 and ZETOR 7211/7245, with the call on each
QuestionDX 3.507211/7245Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?40.7 kW (54.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50”41.0 kW (55.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 7211”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the DX 3.50 and the 7211/7245.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the DX 3.50 and the 7211/7245.
Which pumps more oil for implements?38.0 L/min (10.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50”56.6 L/min (15.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 7211”AheadThe ZETOR 7211/7245 has 49% more hydraulic flow (18.6 L/min / 4.9 gpm) than the Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,400 kg (5,291 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 7211/7245.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,730 kg (6,019 lb) to 3,120 kg (6,878 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50”3,190 kg (7,033 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 7211”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?4,600 kg (10,141 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 7211/7245.
Which has the wider choice of gears?16Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50”10 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 7211”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the DX 3.50 and the 7211/7245.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 7211”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the ZETOR 7211/7245 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 7211”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 7211”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 7211”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1984–19961984–1993EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The ZETOR 7211/7245 has 49% more hydraulic flow (18.6 L/min / 4.9 gpm) than the Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the ZETOR 7211/7245 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources