Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50 or New Holland 4835?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the New Holland 4835: hydraulic flow. It is also ahead on forward gears.

  • The New Holland 4835 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 21% (8.0 L/min / 2.1 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50 and New Holland 4835, with the call on each
QuestionDX 3.504835Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?40.7 kW (54.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50”41.2 kW (55 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4835 (T)”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the DX 3.50 and the 4835.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the DX 3.50 and the 4835.
Which pumps more oil for implements?38.0 L/min (10.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50”46.0 L/min (12.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4835 Turbo”AheadThe New Holland 4835 has 21% more hydraulic flow (8.0 L/min / 2.1 gpm) than the Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,400 kg (5,291 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50”—No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 4835.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,730 kg (6,019 lb) to 3,120 kg (6,878 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50”3,270 kg (7,209 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4835 (T)”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?4,600 kg (10,141 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50”—No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 4835.
Which has the wider choice of gears?16Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50”24Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4835 (T)”AheadThe New Holland 4835 has 50% more forward gears (8 gears) than the Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the DX 3.50 and the 4835.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4835 (T)”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50”540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4835 (T)”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50”independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4835 (T)”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4835 (T)”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1984–19961996–1998Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland 4835 is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The New Holland 4835 has 21% more hydraulic flow (8.0 L/min / 2.1 gpm) than the Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The New Holland 4835 has 50% more forward gears (8 gears) than the Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The New Holland 4835 is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources