Deutz-Fahr DX 3.10 or IMT 560?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the Deutz-Fahr DX 3.10 is ahead on forward gears, PTO speeds and drive.

  • The Deutz-Fahr DX 3.10 suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.
  • The Deutz-Fahr DX 3.10 suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Deutz-Fahr DX 3.10 and IMT 560, with the call on each
QuestionDX 3.10560Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?32.6 kW (43.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.10”32.2 kW (43.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 560”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the DX 3.10 and the 560.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the DX 3.10 and the 560.
Which pumps more oil for implements?34.4 L/min (9.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.10”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 560.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,900 kg (4,189 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.10”1,755 kg (3,869 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 560”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,540 kg (5,600 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.10”2,470 kg (5,445 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 560”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?4,000 kg (8,818 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.10”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 560.
Which has the wider choice of gears?8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.10”6Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 560”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr DX 3.10 has 33% more forward gears (2 gears) than the IMT 560 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the DX 3.10 and the 560.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.10”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 560”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.10”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 560”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr DX 3.10 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the IMT 560 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the DX 3.10 and the 560.
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.10”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 560”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr DX 3.10 is available with four-wheel drive; the IMT 560 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1984–19901980–1986EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Deutz-Fahr DX 3.10 has 33% more forward gears (2 gears) than the IMT 560 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr DX 3.10 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the IMT 560 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Deutz-Fahr DX 3.10 is available with four-wheel drive; the IMT 560 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources