Deutz-Fahr DX 160 or URSUS 1.604?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the DX 160 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1.604 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Deutz-Fahr DX 160 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 22% (1,177 kg / 2,595 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Deutz-Fahr DX 160 and URSUS 1.604, with the call on each
QuestionDX 1601.604Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?110.4 kW (148.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 160”110.3 kW (147.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1604”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the DX 160 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1.604 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the DX 160 and the 1.604.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the DX 160 and the 1.604.
Which pumps more oil for implements?58.4 L/min (15.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 160”—No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 1.604.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?6,500 kg (14,330 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 160”5,323 kg (11,735 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1604”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr DX 160 has 22% more lift (1,177 kg / 2,595 lb) than the URSUS 1.604 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?5,400 kg (11,905 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 160”4,910 kg (10,825 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1604”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 160”—No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1.604.
Which has the wider choice of gears?24Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 160”12Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1604”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr DX 160 has 100% more forward gears (12 gears) than the URSUS 1.604 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the DX 160 and the 1.604.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 160”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1604”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 160”1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1604”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 160”—No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 1.604.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 160”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1604”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1978–19841978–1984EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Deutz-Fahr DX 160 has 22% more lift (1,177 kg / 2,595 lb) than the URSUS 1.604 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr DX 160 has 100% more forward gears (12 gears) than the URSUS 1.604 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the DX 160 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1.604 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources