Deutz-Fahr DX 160 or Massey Ferguson MF 1132?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Deutz-Fahr DX 160: hydraulic flow, three-point lift and maximum permissible mass. It is also ahead on forward gears. On features, the Massey Ferguson MF 1132 is ahead on PTO speeds.
- The Massey Ferguson MF 1132 suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 540 rpm.
- The Deutz-Fahr DX 160 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 30% (13.4 L/min / 3.5 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 132% (3,700 kg / 8,157 lb) more three-point lift.
- The Deutz-Fahr DX 160 suits road haulage better on this data: 13% (1,000 kg / 2,205 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | DX 160 | MF 1132 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 94.5 kW (126.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 160” | 94 kW (126 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1132” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the DX 160 and the MF 1132. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the DX 160 and the MF 1132. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 58.4 L/min (15.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 160” | 45.0 L/min (11.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1132” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr DX 160 has 30% more hydraulic flow (13.4 L/min / 3.5 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson MF 1132 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 6,500 kg (14,330 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 160” | 2,800 kg (6,173 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1132” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr DX 160 has 132% more lift (3,700 kg / 8,157 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 1132 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 5,400 kg (11,905 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 160” | 5,860 kg (12,919 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1132” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 160” | 7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1132” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr DX 160 has 13% higher maximum permissible mass (1,000 kg / 2,205 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 1132 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 24Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 160” | 16Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1132” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr DX 160 has 50% more forward gears (8 gears) than the Massey Ferguson MF 1132 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1132” | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the DX 160. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 160” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1132” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 160” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1132” | AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 1132 offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Deutz-Fahr DX 160 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 160” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1132” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 160” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1132” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1978–1984 | 1977–1982 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Deutz-Fahr DX 160 has 30% more hydraulic flow (13.4 L/min / 3.5 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson MF 1132 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr DX 160 has 132% more lift (3,700 kg / 8,157 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 1132 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr DX 160 has 13% higher maximum permissible mass (1,000 kg / 2,205 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 1132 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr DX 160 has 50% more forward gears (8 gears) than the Massey Ferguson MF 1132 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Massey Ferguson MF 1132 offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Deutz-Fahr DX 160 does not (as stated by the sources).
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources