Deutz-Fahr D 6007 (C) or J.I. Case 770?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the D 6007 (C) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 770 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Deutz-Fahr D 6007 (C) and J.I. Case 770, with the call on each
QuestionD 6007 (C)770Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?41.95 kW (56.26 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr D 6007”41.9 kW (56.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 770”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the D 6007 (C) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 770 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the D 6007 (C) and the 770.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the D 6007 (C) and the 770.
Which pumps more oil for implements?60.6 L/min (16.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 770”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the D 6007 (C).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,400 kg (5,291 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr D 6007”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 770.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,410 kg (5,313 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr D 6007”4,105 kg (9,050 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 770”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The J.I. Case 770 is 70% heavier (1,695 kg / 3,737 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr D 6007 (C) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?4,000 kg (8,818 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr D 6007”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 770.
Which has the wider choice of gears?8Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr D 6007”8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Case 770”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the D 6007 (C) and the 770.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr D 6007”25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 770”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr D 6007”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case 770”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case 770”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the D 6007 (C).
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr D 6007”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case 770”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr D 6007 (C) is available with four-wheel drive; the J.I. Case 770 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1982–19841969–1973Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr D 6007 (C) is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The J.I. Case 770 is 70% heavier (1,695 kg / 3,737 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr D 6007 (C) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr D 6007 (C) is available with four-wheel drive; the J.I. Case 770 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • The Deutz-Fahr D 6007 (C) is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the D 6007 (C) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 770 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources