Deutz-Fahr D 6207 (C) or Steyr 760 (a)?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Steyr 760 (a): maximum permissible mass. It is also ahead on forward gears and PTO speeds.
- The Steyr 760 (a) suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.
- The Steyr 760 (a) suits road haulage better on this data: 13% (500 kg / 1,102 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | D 6207 (C) | 760 (a) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 39.5 kW (53.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr D 6207” | 39.7 kW (53.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 760” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the D 6207 (C) and the 760 (a). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the D 6207 (C) and the 760 (a). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 35.3 L/min (9.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr D 6207” | 33.6 L/min (8.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 760” | EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,400 kg (5,291 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr D 6207” | 2,400 kg (5,291 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 760” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,530 kg (5,578 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr D 6207” | 2,685 kg (5,919 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 760” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 4,000 kg (8,818 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr D 6207” | 4,500 kg (9,921 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 760” | AheadThe Steyr 760 (a) has 13% higher maximum permissible mass (500 kg / 1,102 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr D 6207 (C) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr D 6207” | 16Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 760” | AheadThe Steyr 760 (a) has 100% more forward gears (8 gears) than the Deutz-Fahr D 6207 (C) (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the D 6207 (C) and the 760 (a). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr D 6207” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 760” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr D 6207” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 760” | AheadThe Steyr 760 (a) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Deutz-Fahr D 6207 (C) does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | liveTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 760” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the D 6207 (C). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr D 6207” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 760” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1981–1982 | 1971–1976 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr D 6207 (C) is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Steyr 760 (a) has 13% higher maximum permissible mass (500 kg / 1,102 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr D 6207 (C) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- The Steyr 760 (a) has 100% more forward gears (8 gears) than the Deutz-Fahr D 6207 (C) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Steyr 760 (a) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Deutz-Fahr D 6207 (C) does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Deutz-Fahr D 6207 (C) is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources