Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 110 MK3 or John Deere 2900?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Agrotron 110 MK3 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2900 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 110 MK3 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 39% (1,760 kg / 3,880 lb) more three-point lift.
  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 110 MK3 suits road haulage better on this data: 13% (1,000 kg / 2,205 lb) more maximum permissible mass and 14% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 110 MK3 and John Deere 2900, with the call on each
QuestionAgrotron 110 MK32900Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?77.3 kW (103.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 110 MK3”77.3 kW (103.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2900”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrotron 110 MK3 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2900 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Agrotron 110 MK3 and the 2900.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Agrotron 110 MK3 and the 2900.
Which pumps more oil for implements?83.0 L/min (21.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 110 MK3”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 2900.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?6,220 kg (13,713 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 110 MK3”4,460 kg (9,833 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2900”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 110 MK3 has 39% more lift (1,760 kg / 3,880 lb) than the John Deere 2900 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?5,010 kg (11,045 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 110 MK3”4,180 kg (9,215 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2900”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 110 MK3 is 20% heavier (830 kg / 1,830 lb) than the John Deere 2900 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 110 MK3”7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2900”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 110 MK3 has 13% higher maximum permissible mass (1,000 kg / 2,205 lb) than the John Deere 2900 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?24Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 110 MK3”16 to 18Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2900”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 110 MK3 has 33% more forward gears (6 gears) than the John Deere 2900 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Agrotron 110 MK3 and the 2900.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 110 MK3”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 35 km/h (21.7 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2900”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 110 MK3 has 14% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the John Deere 2900 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 110 MK3”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2900”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 110 MK3”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 2900.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 110 MK3”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2900”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2000–20031993–1996Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 110 MK3 is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 110 MK3 has 39% more lift (1,760 kg / 3,880 lb) than the John Deere 2900 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 110 MK3 is 20% heavier (830 kg / 1,830 lb) than the John Deere 2900 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 110 MK3 has 13% higher maximum permissible mass (1,000 kg / 2,205 lb) than the John Deere 2900 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 110 MK3 has 33% more forward gears (6 gears) than the John Deere 2900 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 110 MK3 has 14% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the John Deere 2900 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 110 MK3 is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrotron 110 MK3 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2900 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources