Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08 or VALMET 1103/1103-4?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the AgroStar 6.08 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1103/1103-4 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 64% (22.5 L/min / 5.9 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 60% (1,950 kg / 4,299 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08 and VALMET 1103/1103-4, with the call on each
QuestionAgroStar 6.081103/1103-4Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?78.8 kW (105.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08”78.7 kW (105.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 1103”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the AgroStar 6.08 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1103/1103-4 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the AgroStar 6.08 and the 1103/1103-4.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the AgroStar 6.08 and the 1103/1103-4.
Which pumps more oil for implements?57.5 L/min (15.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08”35.0 L/min (9.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 1103”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08 has 64% more hydraulic flow (22.5 L/min / 5.9 gpm) than the VALMET 1103/1103-4 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?5,200 kg (11,464 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08”3,250 kg (7,165 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 1103”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08 has 60% more lift (1,950 kg / 4,299 lb) than the VALMET 1103/1103-4 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?4,540 kg (10,009 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08”3,950 kg (8,708 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 1103”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08 is 15% heavier (590 kg / 1,301 lb) than the VALMET 1103/1103-4 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1103/1103-4.
Which has the wider choice of gears?40 to 48Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08”16Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 1103”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08 has 150% more forward gears (24 gears) than the VALMET 1103/1103-4 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 1103/1103-4.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 1103”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000/750 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 1103”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08 offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the VALMET 1103/1103-4 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 1103/1103-4.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 1103”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1993–19951979–1980Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08 is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08 has 64% more hydraulic flow (22.5 L/min / 5.9 gpm) than the VALMET 1103/1103-4 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08 has 60% more lift (1,950 kg / 4,299 lb) than the VALMET 1103/1103-4 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08 is 15% heavier (590 kg / 1,301 lb) than the VALMET 1103/1103-4 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08 has 150% more forward gears (24 gears) than the VALMET 1103/1103-4 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08 offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the VALMET 1103/1103-4 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08 is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the AgroStar 6.08 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1103/1103-4 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources