Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08 or Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.05?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the AgroStar 6.08 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Agrotron 6.05 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.05 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 43% (24.8 L/min / 6.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | AgroStar 6.08 | Agrotron 6.05 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 78.8 kW (105.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08” | 78.3 kW (105.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.05” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the AgroStar 6.08 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Agrotron 6.05 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the AgroStar 6.08 and the Agrotron 6.05. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the AgroStar 6.08 and the Agrotron 6.05. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 57.5 L/min (15.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08” | 82.3 L/min (21.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.05” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.05 has 43% more hydraulic flow (24.8 L/min / 6.6 gpm) than the Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 5,200 kg (11,464 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the Agrotron 6.05. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 4,540 kg (10,009 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08” | 5,010 kg (11,045 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.05” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.05 is 10% heavier (470 kg / 1,036 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08” | 8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.05” | EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 40 to 48Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08” | 15 to 18Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.05” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08 has 122% more forward gears (22 gears) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.05 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08” | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Agrotron 6.05. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.05” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000/750 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.05” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08 offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.05 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.05” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.05” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1993–1995 | 1995–1997 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.05 has 43% more hydraulic flow (24.8 L/min / 6.6 gpm) than the Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.05 is 10% heavier (470 kg / 1,036 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08 has 122% more forward gears (22 gears) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.05 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08 offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.05 does not (as stated by the sources).
- Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the AgroStar 6.08 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Agrotron 6.05 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources