Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 410 vs New Holland T4.75

7 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 410

from 2009

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

New Holland T4.75

from 2011

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

We will not advise between these two machines, because they were not built in overlapping years (2009–2009; 2011–2011). The figures below are side by side so you can judge them yourself; each says whether it was measured, claimed or declared by its source.

Field by field

7 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 410 and New Holland T4.75, field by field
FieldAgroplus 410T4.75Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed83.8 hp84 hp
Engine declaredSame 1000.4 WTI 2 E3
Displacement declared4.00 L
Maximum torque declared254 lb·ft · 345 N·m206 lb·ft · 279.4 N·m+23% Agroplus 410
Transmission
Top speed declared24.9 mph · 40 km/h24.9 mph · 40 km/h
Clutch declaredHydraulically operated single-plate dry clutch
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declaredOpen centre
Pump flow declared10.8 gpm · 41.0 L/min12.5 gpm · 47.5 L/min+16% T4.75
Three-point lift at ends declared5,986 lb · 2,715 kg
Rear PTO speeds declared540/540E/1000 rpm540/1000 rpmdiffers
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared7,518 lb · 3,410 kg6,173 lb · 2,800 kg+22% Agroplus 410
Maximum permissible mass declared10,582 lb · 4,800 kg
Wheelbase declared87.8 in · 2,230 mm
Length declared140.2 in · 3,560 mm149.3 in · 3,792 mm+7% T4.75
Width declared81.5–91.7 in · 2,070–2,330 mm76.8 in · 1,950 mmdiffers
Height declared96.7 in · 2,455 mm93.7 in · 2,380 mm
Ground clearance declared15.4 in · 390 mm15.0 in · 380 mm
Turning radius, braked declared12.8 ft · 3.90 m12.0 ft · 3.66 m+7% Agroplus 410
Fuel tank declared95.1 qt · 90 L

Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 410 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 410”

New Holland T4.75 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T4.75”
  • Source: OECD test report 2743, 2013
  • Source: OECD test report 2887, 2015
  • Source: OECD test report 2887, 2015