Deutz (KHD) F2L 514/4 or Zickler 3754?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the F2L 514/4 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 3754 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Deutz F2L 514/4 suits road haulage better on this data: 78% (1,310 kg / 2,888 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | F2L 514/4 | 3754 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 22 kW (30 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz F2L 514/4” | 22.1 kW (30 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zickler 3754” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the F2L 514/4 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 3754 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the F2L 514/4 and the 3754. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the F2L 514/4 and the 3754. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 18.0 L/min (4.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz F2L 514/4” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 3754. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | 450 kg (992 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zickler 3754” | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the F2L 514/4. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,925 kg (4,244 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz F2L 514/4” | 1,050 kg (2,315 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zickler 3754” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz F2L 514/4 is 83% heavier (875 kg / 1,929 lb) than the Zickler 3754 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 3,000 kg (6,614 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz F2L 514/4” | 1,690 kg (3,726 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zickler 3754” | AheadThe Deutz F2L 514/4 has 78% higher maximum permissible mass (1,310 kg / 2,888 lb) than the Zickler 3754 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 7Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz F2L 514/4” | 6Traktorenlexikon, “Zickler 3754” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the F2L 514/4 and the 3754. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz F2L 514/4” | 18.79 km/h (11.7 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zickler 3754” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz F2L 514/4” | 588 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zickler 3754” | No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the 3754. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | dependent (stops with the clutch)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz F2L 514/4” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 3754. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz F2L 514/4” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Zickler 3754” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1956–1960 | 1966–1967 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Zickler 3754 is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Deutz F2L 514/4 is 83% heavier (875 kg / 1,929 lb) than the Zickler 3754 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz F2L 514/4 has 78% higher maximum permissible mass (1,310 kg / 2,888 lb) than the Zickler 3754 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- The Zickler 3754 is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the F2L 514/4 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 3754 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources