Deutz (KHD) F1L514/2-N or International Harvester CUB-154 LO-BOY?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the F1L514/2-N has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the CUB-154 LO-BOY has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Deutz F1L514/2-N suits road haulage better on this data: 67% (8.0 km/h / 5.0 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | F1L514/2-N | CUB-154 LO-BOY | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 11 kW (15 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz F1L 514/2-N” | 11 kW (15 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC Cub 154 Lo-Boy” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the F1L514/2-N has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the CUB-154 LO-BOY has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the F1L514/2-N and the CUB-154 LO-BOY. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the F1L514/2-N and the CUB-154 LO-BOY. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 7.6 L/min (2.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC Cub 154 Lo-Boy” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the F1L514/2-N. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 675 kg (1,488 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz F1L 514/2-N” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the CUB-154 LO-BOY. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,345 kg (2,965 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz F1L 514/2-N” | 671 kg (1,479 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC Cub 154 Lo-Boy” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz F1L514/2-N is 100% heavier (674 kg / 1,486 lb) than the International Harvester CUB-154 LO-BOY (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 1,900 kg (4,189 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz F1L 514/2-N” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the CUB-154 LO-BOY. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 5Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz F1L 514/2-N” | 3 to 6Traktorenlexikon, “IHC Cub 154 Lo-Boy” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the F1L514/2-N and the CUB-154 LO-BOY. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz F1L 514/2-N” | 12 km/h (7.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC Cub 154 Lo-Boy” | AheadThe Deutz F1L514/2-N has 67% more top speed (8.0 km/h / 5.0 mph) than the International Harvester CUB-154 LO-BOY (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 1220Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz F1L 514/2-N” | 1800Traktorenlexikon, “IHC Cub 154 Lo-Boy” | No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the F1L514/2-N and the CUB-154 LO-BOY. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | dependent (stops with the clutch)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz F1L 514/2-N” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the CUB-154 LO-BOY. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz F1L 514/2-N” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “IHC Cub 154 Lo-Boy” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1956–1957 | 1968–1974 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The International Harvester CUB-154 LO-BOY is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Deutz F1L514/2-N is 100% heavier (674 kg / 1,486 lb) than the International Harvester CUB-154 LO-BOY (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz F1L514/2-N has 67% more top speed (8.0 km/h / 5.0 mph) than the International Harvester CUB-154 LO-BOY (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The International Harvester CUB-154 LO-BOY is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the F1L514/2-N has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the CUB-154 LO-BOY has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources