Deutz (KHD) D 7506 or International Harvester Farmall 706?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the International Harvester Farmall 706: hydraulic flow. On features, the Deutz D 7506 is ahead on drive.
- The International Harvester Farmall 706 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 100% (22.7 L/min / 6.0 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | D 7506 | Farmall 706 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 52.5 kW (70.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 7506” | 51.3 kW (68.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Farmall Farmall 706” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the D 7506 and the Farmall 706. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the D 7506 and the Farmall 706. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 22.8 L/min (6.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 7506” | 45.5 L/min (12.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Farmall Farmall 706” | AheadThe International Harvester Farmall 706 has 100% more hydraulic flow (22.7 L/min / 6.0 gpm) than the Deutz D 7506 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,100 kg (4,630 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 7506” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the Farmall 706. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,155 kg (6,956 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 7506” | 3,946 kg (8,699 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Farmall Farmall 706” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The International Harvester Farmall 706 is 25% heavier (791 kg / 1,744 lb) than the Deutz D 7506 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 5,800 kg (12,787 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 7506” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Farmall 706. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 7506” | 8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Farmall Farmall 706” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the D 7506 and the Farmall 706. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 7506” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Farmall Farmall 706” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 7506” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Farmall Farmall 706” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 7506” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Farmall 706. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 7506” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Farmall Farmall 706” | AheadThe Deutz D 7506 is available with four-wheel drive; the International Harvester Farmall 706 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1968–1970 | 1963–1967 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz D 7506 is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The International Harvester Farmall 706 has 100% more hydraulic flow (22.7 L/min / 6.0 gpm) than the Deutz D 7506 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The International Harvester Farmall 706 is 25% heavier (791 kg / 1,744 lb) than the Deutz D 7506 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz D 7506 is available with four-wheel drive; the International Harvester Farmall 706 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The Deutz D 7506 is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources