Deutz (KHD) D 6806 or International Harvester 674?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the International Harvester 674: hydraulic flow. It is also ahead on PTO speeds.

  • The International Harvester 674 suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.
  • The International Harvester 674 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 49% (13.8 L/min / 3.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Deutz (KHD) D 6806 and International Harvester 674, with the call on each
QuestionD 6806674Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?43.9 kW (58.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 6806”43.8 kW (58.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 674”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the D 6806 and the 674.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the D 6806 and the 674.
Which pumps more oil for implements?28.3 L/min (7.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 6806”42.1 L/min (11.1 gpm) to 47.7 L/min (12.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 674”AheadThe International Harvester 674 has 49% more hydraulic flow (13.8 L/min / 3.6 gpm) than the Deutz D 6806 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,910 kg (4,211 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 674”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the D 6806.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,760 kg (6,085 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 6806”2,316 kg (5,106 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 674”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz D 6806 is 19% heavier (444 kg / 979 lb) than the International Harvester 674 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?5,000 kg (11,023 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 6806”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 674.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 6806”8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 674”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the D 6806 and the 674.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 6806”25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 674”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 6806”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 674”AheadThe International Harvester 674 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Deutz D 6806 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 674”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the D 6806.
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 6806”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 674”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1974–19801973–1975EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The International Harvester 674 has 49% more hydraulic flow (13.8 L/min / 3.6 gpm) than the Deutz D 6806 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz D 6806 is 19% heavier (444 kg / 979 lb) than the International Harvester 674 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The International Harvester 674 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Deutz D 6806 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources