Deutz (KHD) D 12006 A or J.I. Case 2090?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the D 12006 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2090 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Deutz (KHD) D 12006 A and J.I. Case 2090, with the call on each
QuestionD 12006 A2090Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?88 kW (118 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 12006”88.3 kW (118.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2090”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the D 12006 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2090 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the D 12006 A and the 2090.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the D 12006 A and the 2090.
Which pumps more oil for implements?—79.5 L/min (21.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2090”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the D 12006 A.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,300 kg (5,071 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 12006”4,500 kg (9,921 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2090”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the D 12006 A: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 12006”); the 2090: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2090”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?4,660 kg (10,274 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 12006”5,402 kg (11,909 lb) to 5,457 kg (12,031 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2090”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The J.I. Case 2090 is 16% heavier (742 kg / 1,636 lb) than the Deutz D 12006A (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 12006”—No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 2090.
Which has the wider choice of gears?—8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2090”No figureNo call on forward gears: no figure on record for the D 12006 A.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 12006”—No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 2090.
Which is faster on the road?29 km/h (18.0 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 12006”25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2090”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 12006”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case 2090”AheadThe J.I. Case 2090 offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Deutz D 12006A does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 12006”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case 2090”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 12006”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case 2090”AheadThe Deutz D 12006A is available with four-wheel drive; the J.I. Case 2090 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?19711978–1983Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The J.I. Case 2090 is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The J.I. Case 2090 is 16% heavier (742 kg / 1,636 lb) than the Deutz D 12006A (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The J.I. Case 2090 offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Deutz D 12006A does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Deutz D 12006A is available with four-wheel drive; the J.I. Case 2090 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • The J.I. Case 2090 is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the D 12006 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2090 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the D 12006 A: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 12006”); the 2090: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2090”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, forward gears and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources