DEUTZ-ALLIS 8050 or Fendt Favorit 614 LSA?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 8050 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Favorit 614 LSA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Fendt Favorit 614 LSA suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 8050 | Favorit 614 LSA | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 113.3 kW (151.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 8050” | 113.5 kW (152.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 614 LSA” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 8050 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Favorit 614 LSA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 8050 and the Favorit 614 LSA. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 8050 and the Favorit 614 LSA. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 83.3 L/min (22.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 8050” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Favorit 614 LSA. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | 7,410 kg (16,336 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 614 LSA” | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 8050. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 6,942 kg (15,304 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 8050” | 6,530 kg (14,396 lb) to 6,765 kg (14,914 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 614 LSA” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 8050 and the Favorit 614 LSA. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 8050” | 20Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 614 LSA” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 614 LSA” | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 8050. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 8050” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 614 LSA” | AheadThe Fendt Favorit 614 LSA has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the DEUTZ-ALLIS 8050 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 8050” | — | No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the Favorit 614 LSA. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 8050” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Favorit 614 LSA. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 8050” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 614 LSA” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1985–1988 | 1983–1993 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Fendt Favorit 614 LSA has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the DEUTZ-ALLIS 8050 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 8050 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Favorit 614 LSA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources