DEUTZ-ALLIS 6275 or Massey Ferguson MF 3055 (A)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 6275 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 3055 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 3055 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 16% (6.9 L/min / 1.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 23% (756 kg / 1,667 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for DEUTZ-ALLIS 6275 and Massey Ferguson MF 3055 (A), with the call on each
Question6275MF 3055 (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?54.4 kW (73.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6275”55 kW (74 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3055”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 6275 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 3055 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 6275 and the MF 3055 (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 6275 and the MF 3055 (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?43.1 L/min (11.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6275”50.0 L/min (13.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3055”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 3055 (A) has 16% more hydraulic flow (6.9 L/min / 1.8 gpm) than the DEUTZ-ALLIS 6275 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,299 kg (7,273 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6275”4,055 kg (8,940 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3055”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 3055 (A) has 23% more lift (756 kg / 1,667 lb) than the DEUTZ-ALLIS 6275 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?3,550 kg (7,826 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6275”3,900 kg (8,598 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3055”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 6275 and the MF 3055 (A).
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6275”16Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3055”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 3055 (A) has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the DEUTZ-ALLIS 6275 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 6275 and the MF 3055 (A).
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6275”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3055”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6275”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3055”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6275”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3055”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6275”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3055”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1986–19901993–1995Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson MF 3055 (A) is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 3055 (A) has 16% more hydraulic flow (6.9 L/min / 1.8 gpm) than the DEUTZ-ALLIS 6275 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 3055 (A) has 23% more lift (756 kg / 1,667 lb) than the DEUTZ-ALLIS 6275 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 3055 (A) has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the DEUTZ-ALLIS 6275 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 3055 (A) is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 6275 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 3055 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources