DEUTZ-ALLIS 6265 or Fiat PRIMO 60-66 DT/Turbo?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 6265 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the PRIMO 60-66 DT/Turbo has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The DEUTZ-ALLIS 6265 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 23% (7.7 L/min / 2.0 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 6265 | PRIMO 60-66 DT/Turbo | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 48.5 kW (65.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6265” | 48.6 kW (65.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 60-66 Turbo/60-66 DT Turbo” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 6265 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the PRIMO 60-66 DT/Turbo has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 6265 and the PRIMO 60-66 DT/Turbo. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 6265 and the PRIMO 60-66 DT/Turbo. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 40.5 L/min (10.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6265” | 32.8 L/min (8.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 60-66 Turbo/60-66 DT Turbo” | AheadThe DEUTZ-ALLIS 6265 has 23% more hydraulic flow (7.7 L/min / 2.0 gpm) than the Fiat PRIMO 60-66 DT/Turbo (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,600 kg (5,732 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6265” | 2,260 kg (4,982 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 60-66 Turbo/60-66 DT Turbo” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 6265: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6265”); the PRIMO 60-66 DT/Turbo: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 60-66 Turbo/60-66 DT Turbo”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,550 kg (7,826 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6265” | 2,920 kg (6,437 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 60-66 Turbo/60-66 DT Turbo” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The DEUTZ-ALLIS 6265 is 22% heavier (630 kg / 1,389 lb) than the Fiat PRIMO 60-66 DT/Turbo (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 4,200 kg (9,259 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 60-66 Turbo/60-66 DT Turbo” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 6265. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6265” | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 60-66 Turbo/60-66 DT Turbo” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 6265 and the PRIMO 60-66 DT/Turbo. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6265” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 60-66 Turbo/60-66 DT Turbo” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6265” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 60-66 Turbo/60-66 DT Turbo” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6265” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 60-66 Turbo/60-66 DT Turbo” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6265” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 60-66 Turbo/60-66 DT Turbo” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1986–1989 | 1988–1992 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The DEUTZ-ALLIS 6265 has 23% more hydraulic flow (7.7 L/min / 2.0 gpm) than the Fiat PRIMO 60-66 DT/Turbo (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The DEUTZ-ALLIS 6265 is 22% heavier (630 kg / 1,389 lb) than the Fiat PRIMO 60-66 DT/Turbo (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 6265 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the PRIMO 60-66 DT/Turbo has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the 6265: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6265”); the PRIMO 60-66 DT/Turbo: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 60-66 Turbo/60-66 DT Turbo”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources