DEUTZ-ALLIS 6260 or Landini 6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 6260 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The DEUTZ-ALLIS 6260 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 26% (9.9 L/min / 2.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 20% (392 kg / 864 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for DEUTZ-ALLIS 6260 and Landini 6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K), with the call on each
Question62606060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?42.7 kW (57.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6260”42.7 kW (57.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6060”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 6260 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 6260 and the 6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 6260 and the 6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K).
Which pumps more oil for implements?47.5 L/min (12.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6260”37.6 L/min (9.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6060”AheadThe DEUTZ-ALLIS 6260 has 26% more hydraulic flow (9.9 L/min / 2.6 gpm) than the Landini 6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,400 kg (5,291 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6260”2,008 kg (4,427 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6060”AheadThe DEUTZ-ALLIS 6260 has 20% more lift (392 kg / 864 lb) than the Landini 6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?2,930 kg (6,460 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6260”2,400 kg (5,291 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6060”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The DEUTZ-ALLIS 6260 is 22% heavier (530 kg / 1,168 lb) than the Landini 6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?5,000 kg (11,023 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6260”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K).
Which has the wider choice of gears?8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6260”12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6060”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 6260 and the 6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K).
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6260”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6060”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6260”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 6060”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6260”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 6060”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6260”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 6060”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1986–19901993–2000Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Landini 6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K) is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The DEUTZ-ALLIS 6260 has 26% more hydraulic flow (9.9 L/min / 2.6 gpm) than the Landini 6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The DEUTZ-ALLIS 6260 has 20% more lift (392 kg / 864 lb) than the Landini 6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The DEUTZ-ALLIS 6260 is 22% heavier (530 kg / 1,168 lb) than the Landini 6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Landini 6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K) is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 6260 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6060 (DT) TL-39 N/K (TL-39 DT/K) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources