DEUTZ-ALLIS 6260 or Fendt Farmer 304 LS?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 6260 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Farmer 304 LS has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The DEUTZ-ALLIS 6260 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 17% (6.8 L/min / 1.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The DEUTZ-ALLIS 6260 suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.
- The Fendt Farmer 304 LS suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 6260 | Farmer 304 LS | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 42.7 kW (57.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6260” | 42.6 kW (57.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 304 LS” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 6260 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Farmer 304 LS has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 6260 and the Farmer 304 LS. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 6260 and the Farmer 304 LS. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 47.5 L/min (12.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6260” | 40.7 L/min (10.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 304 LS” | AheadThe DEUTZ-ALLIS 6260 has 17% more hydraulic flow (6.8 L/min / 1.8 gpm) than the Fendt Farmer 304 LS (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,400 kg (5,291 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6260” | 2,140 kg (4,718 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 304 LS” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 6260: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6260”); the Farmer 304 LS: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 304 LS”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,930 kg (6,460 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6260” | 3,110 kg (6,856 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 304 LS” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 5,000 kg (11,023 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6260” | 4,700 kg (10,362 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 304 LS” | EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6260” | 15Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 304 LS” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 6260 and the Farmer 304 LS. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6260” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 304 LS” | AheadThe Fendt Farmer 304 LS has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the DEUTZ-ALLIS 6260 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6260” | 540/750/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 304 LS” | AheadThe Fendt Farmer 304 LS offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the DEUTZ-ALLIS 6260 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6260” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Farmer 304 LS. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6260” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 304 LS” | AheadThe DEUTZ-ALLIS 6260 is available with four-wheel drive; the Fendt Farmer 304 LS is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1986–1990 | 1982–1989 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The DEUTZ-ALLIS 6260 has 17% more hydraulic flow (6.8 L/min / 1.8 gpm) than the Fendt Farmer 304 LS (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Fendt Farmer 304 LS has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the DEUTZ-ALLIS 6260 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Fendt Farmer 304 LS offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the DEUTZ-ALLIS 6260 does not (as stated by the sources).
- The DEUTZ-ALLIS 6260 is available with four-wheel drive; the Fendt Farmer 304 LS is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 6260 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Farmer 304 LS has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the 6260: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6260”); the Farmer 304 LS: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 304 LS”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources